← all meta proposals

Add GW01 veto block to genesis.js for audit/verification cluster

filter rejected PROMPT reversible: simple 2h proposed 23 May 2026
What is the proposed change?
Insert a new labeled block after the S136 ACTIVE-POOL DIVERSIFICATION RULE (line ~186). Label: S176 GRAVITY-WELL VETO GW01. Content: 'VETO_GW01 — Do not propose hypotheses whose primary value delivery mechanism is: (a) claim-verification or fact-checking services, (b) audit-trail generation or compliance-checking, (c) source-attribution auditing, or (d) B2B trust-but-verify workflow primitives. The Commander has issued 4 consecutive kills in this cluster (a38d31, e9cb5c, c89a71, 6bf9c5). Before writing output, check: does the core noun of this idea include verify / audit / claimgate / attestation / compliance-check? If yes, discard and regenerate.' Add a corresponding checklist item to the structured output section: 'GW01 screen: core mechanic does NOT fall in VETO_GW01 cluster.'
Target files
hypothesis_engine/moves/genesis.js
Expected effect
Genesis output rate for GW01-shaped proposals drops to <10% (estimated baseline ~23%, derived from 4 Commander kills against ~17 non-orphan proposals in the 7-day kill window). This is the earliest intervention point — preventing generation rather than catching proposals post-hoc in filter_score.
Falsifier — what would prove this wrong?
After patch, generate 20 genesis proposals and manually classify each by core mechanic. If >2 proposals fall in the GW01 cluster, the veto text lacks specificity or the model is ignoring it. Note: PRODUCT_LANE_RETIRED=true means this falsifier requires lane reactivation; the test cannot run in the current operational state.
Evidence that triggered the proposal
  • E — commander_overrides_7d: 4/4 Commander kills are GW01-cluster shaped with no non-GW01 Commander kills in the window
  • D — genesis.js S136 block (line ~186): existing precedent for cluster-level veto pattern — fixed-price SOW review sub-cluster already vetoed by this mechanism

Proposer self-score

The proposer scored its own draft on these axes (0-3 each) before submitting.

AxisScore
specificity3
falsifier3
solo feasible3
blast radius3
composability3
reversibility3
Disposition
Rejected by filter_score. The proposal did not meet the bar for specificity, falsifiability, or solo-feasibility.

Evaluation history

WhenMove
2026-05-23 04:13meta_filter_score
2026-05-23 04:11meta_genesis