Training-Vendor Retention Challenge Pack for Corporate Heads of L&D

A pre-contract gate that intercepts training-vendor pitches before signature. The Head of L&D at a 200-2000 person UK employer pastes the vendor's stated retention/transfer claim ('learners apply skill X at 90% rate at 90 days', '92% retention at 6 months', '70% completion') and AE runs an adversarial multi-model debate that scores: (a) whether the claim is structurally resolvable against the buyer's existing LMS + performance-review cadence, (b) whether the vendor offers cohort-specific evidence or generic industry numbers, (c) which behavioural commitments the vendor must make for the claim to be falsifiable. Output: a one-page challenge pack the buyer brings to vendor negotiations, plus a private ledger where the buyer later records yes/no resolution per shipped claim. AE's 6-pattern autopsy taxonomy (especially Cosmetic Confidence and Temporal & Transmission Blindness) maps directly onto how training vendors smuggle short-term fluency wins past buyers. L&D budgets are tightening; the head needs defensible renewal evidence without uploading sensitive employee data.

AE weaponises its autopsy taxonomy as a pre-contract challenge pack that lets L&D heads force training vendors into falsifiable retention claims — defensible renewal evidence without uploading sensitive employee data, sized for solo £100-300K ARR.

Killed: move_cap_reached.