Outside-Counsel Citation & Holding Pre-Reliance Check for In-House Legal

A pre-reliance gate where in-house General Counsel paste specific factual and legal claims from outside-counsel deliverables — cited cases, claimed holdings, statutory interpretations, regulatory conclusions — before relying on them for board advice, contract sign-off, or regulator filings. The product runs adversarial multi-model debate against each claim using public legal sources (CourtListener, Justia, govinfo, EUR-Lex, regulator archives), then categorises any failures using AE's six-pattern reasoning taxonomy: did outside counsel's AI cite a nonexistent case (Fatal Grounding Immunity), cite a real case whose holding doesn't support the proposition (Premise-Conclusion Severing), dress up dicta as binding precedent (Concession Laundering), or apply a superseded statute (Temporal & Transmission Blindness)? Buyers are 50-200 person founder-led or PE-backed firms whose 1-5 person in-house legal team uses 2-5 outside counsel firms regularly. AE is uniquely suited because the autopsy taxonomy was purpose-built for exactly these reasoning failure modes, and adversarial debate prevents the LLM-as-judge collapse any single-model verifier hits when grading legal text.

AE's reasoning-failure taxonomy and adversarial grading rig are purpose-built for the exact verification gap GCs face when relying on outside counsel's AI-drafted legal claims.

Still in evaluation (phase: ranked). No verdict yet.